Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the tension between the U.S. and China regarding trade policies, particularly in light of recent court rulings against Trump's tariffs [2][8][27] - The Chinese delegation, led by Vice Minister Li Chenggang, engaged in extensive talks with U.S. officials, focusing on the implementation of agreements made during previous high-level discussions [3][5] - The U.S. court ruling declared that most tariffs imposed by the Trump administration were illegal due to lack of congressional authorization, which undermines Trump's trade policy [8][10] Group 2 - Trump's immediate reaction to the court ruling was to label it as politically biased and to announce plans to appeal, emphasizing his commitment to maintaining tariffs [10][13] - The article notes that the soybean trade has become a critical issue, with China significantly reducing its purchases from the U.S. and instead sourcing from Brazil, impacting American farmers [15][17] - Data indicates that since the trade war began, U.S. manufacturing has not benefited from tariffs, and many companies are struggling with increased costs and supply chain disruptions [19][21] Group 3 - The article suggests that the U.S. consumer is bearing the brunt of the tariffs, with a significant portion of the costs being passed down, leading to consumer fatigue regarding high tariffs [21] - China's response to the U.S. court ruling and Trump's statements has been measured, indicating a desire to maintain control over the narrative and not be drawn into political disputes [23][25] - The future of U.S.-China trade relations is framed as being determined by market realities rather than political rhetoric, with an emphasis on cooperation as the path forward [27]
中方代表在华盛顿最后一天,特朗普突然表态:美国一定会赢到最后
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-08-30 14:40