美国法院裁定“特朗普关税”违法，特朗普扬言“美国将陷入灾难”

Core Points - The U.S. Federal Circuit Court ruled that the Trump administration lacked the authority to impose high tariffs globally, indicating that such actions exceed presidential powers [1][2] - The ruling, effective from October 14, allows Trump to appeal, but if unsuccessful, it could lead to the collapse of the tariff framework [2] - This legal battle reflects a broader "legal war" against Trump's tariff policies, with courts acting as checks on his trade strategies [2] Group 1 - The ruling emphasizes the importance of adhering to international law and multilateral trade rules, countering Trump's unilateral approach to trade [2][3] - Trump's tariffs were intended to protect domestic manufacturing and regain negotiating power in global trade, but they have faced widespread criticism for potential negative impacts on costs and supply chains [2][3] - The court's decision sends a strong signal against the notion of trade dominance through domestic law, reinforcing the need for open and predictable policy collaboration among global partners [2][3] Group 2 - The ruling complicates the situation for countries that signed trade agreements with the Trump administration, as it undermines the stability and trust in existing agreements [4] - Nations like Japan, South Korea, and the EU, which made significant concessions for better market access, now face uncertainty regarding the continuation of these agreements [4] - This situation tests the resilience and flexibility of multilateral relationships, requiring countries to navigate the complexities of existing agreements amidst changing U.S. policies [4]