迪卡侬的十字路口：中产看不上，穷鬼穿不起

Core Viewpoint - Decathlon, once known as an affordable sports paradise, has transformed into a brand perceived as expensive and less appealing due to significant price increases without corresponding improvements in product quality or consumer experience [4][12][14]. Group 1: Price Increases and Consumer Sentiment - From 2022 to 2024, the average selling price of Decathlon products rose from 128.81 yuan to 196.32 yuan, marking a 52% increase [4]. - Classic products have seen notable price hikes, such as a 20L backpack increasing from 49.9 yuan to 89.9 yuan and a fleece jacket from 249 yuan to 499 yuan [7]. - Consumers express feelings of betrayal as they perceive the price increases without enhanced value, leading to a shift in purchasing behavior [12][14]. Group 2: Market Position and Competition - Decathlon's strategy to raise prices aims to transition from a budget brand to a more premium positioning, but this has alienated both price-sensitive consumers and potential high-end buyers [32][39]. - The outdoor sports market is experiencing a general price increase, with many brands successfully raising prices while maintaining consumer interest, unlike Decathlon [15][17]. - Competitors in the outdoor segment, such as Camel and Columbia, have also raised prices significantly, yet they continue to attract consumers [16]. Group 3: Brand Strategy and Identity - Decathlon has attempted to rebrand itself under new leadership, focusing on becoming a multi-domain professional sports brand, but the execution has not resonated with consumers [25][27]. - The brand's identity is perceived as fragmented, with a mix of low-priced and high-end products leading to confusion among consumers about its core value proposition [33][34]. - The recent introduction of a free promotional item, the "urea bag," has garnered positive attention, suggesting a potential return to its roots of practicality and affordability [56][62]. Group 4: Financial Performance - In 2024, Decathlon reported revenues of 16.2 billion euros but experienced a 15.5% decline in profits, indicating that price increases have not translated into brand premiumization [29][30]. - The company is reportedly considering selling a 30% stake in its Chinese subsidiary, valued at approximately 10 billion yuan, reflecting challenges in its market strategy [31].