李在明赠特MAGA帽，中韩制造业全面冲突，韩国已决心彻底倒向美国

Group 1 - South Korea is making a significant investment of $150 billion in the U.S. shipbuilding industry, with Hanwha Group committing $5 billion to increase annual production from less than two ships to over 20 [1] - This investment plan includes upgrading shipyards, training workers, and directly supporting the maintenance of the U.S. Navy's vessels, indicating a shift from traditional diplomatic gestures to a state-led industrial migration [1][21] - The strategic pivot is underscored by President Lee Jae-myung's statement that South Korea can no longer rely on the "security from the U.S. and economy from China" approach, reflecting a complete turnaround in the country's foreign economic strategy [1][11] Group 2 - Historically, South Korea has relied on alliances with major powers for survival and development, exchanging military support for industrialization funds post-World War II [3] - The end of the Cold War allowed South Korea to integrate into the global supply chain led by the West, achieving economic growth particularly in semiconductors, shipbuilding, and automotive sectors, but this has also led to deep dependencies on Western technology [5][7] - The ongoing U.S.-China rivalry has intensified pressures on South Korea, which faces increasing competition from China in traditional sectors like semiconductors and automotive [9][12] Group 3 - The large-scale foreign investment raises concerns about potential hollowing out of domestic industries, despite assurances from Hanwha that local production capacity will not be affected [13] - South Korea's willingness to take this risk stems from a belief that a strong alliance with the U.S. is essential for survival amid potential crises [14] - The geopolitical landscape has shifted since the Ukraine conflict, prompting South Korea to reassess its position, with some analysts suggesting it could become an "Asian version of Ukraine" [16] Group 4 - The stakes of this investment extend beyond immediate trade relations, as South Korea's future may hinge on the outcome of U.S.-China competition, with potential benefits of becoming a core ally if the U.S. maintains an advantage [18] - Conversely, if the U.S. fails, South Korea risks losing a key economic partner and facing severe impacts on its domestic industries due to premature alignment [20] - The high-profile nature of President Lee's visit, including symbolic gifts, emphasizes the commitment to this strategic gamble, with the substantial investment plan being the most significant aspect [21][23]