特朗普终于得偿所愿，欧盟主动递出脖子，最新立法推进，或取消所有美国工业品关税

Group 1 - The EU is rapidly advancing legislation to eliminate all tariffs on U.S. industrial goods and is also preparing to reduce tariffs on certain U.S. seafood and agricultural products, with a focus on meeting a timeline set by Trump [1][3] - The agreement appears to favor the U.S. more than the EU, as the EU acknowledges that the deal is intended to provide "stability" and "predictability," but this stability aligns with the U.S. agenda [1][5] - There is internal backlash within the EU, with 55% of surveyed companies believing the agreement places an excessive burden on Europe, and concerns about the lack of a predictable tariff ceiling [3][5] Group 2 - The U.S. strategy involves leveraging tariffs and export controls to compel the EU to negotiate on digital regulations, which the EU insists are sovereign rights and not subject to trade negotiations [3][7] - The automotive sector is particularly affected, as the U.S. is the largest export market for European cars, with a significant portion of exports at risk due to potential tariff increases [7][8] - The EU's decision to eliminate tariffs on U.S. industrial goods may weaken its negotiating position, as it risks losing leverage in future discussions [7][8] Group 3 - The EU's approach to trade negotiations is characterized by a lack of clear boundaries and tools, which may lead to an escalation of trade tensions rather than resolution [8] - The potential for the U.S. to reinterpret or ignore the terms of the agreement poses a significant risk for the EU, as it may lead to renewed tariff increases [7][8] - The EU's legislative process may face challenges, as there are concerns about the symmetry and legality of the agreement, which could result in delays or rejections by the European Parliament [7][8]