观察纸质凭证，能发现财务造假？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and limitations of using physical documents to detect anomalies in financial practices, particularly in the context of increasing digitization and paperless operations in companies [18][20][33]. Group 1: Anomaly Detection in Physical Documents - Observing the condition of physical documents, such as their age and wear, can indicate potential fraud if discrepancies are found [2][15]. - The traditional method of examining physical documents for signs of age or usage is becoming less relevant due to the shift towards digital documentation [18][21]. - Companies used to rely on the physical state of documents to identify irregularities, but this approach is now outdated as most records are maintained electronically [20][33]. Group 2: Changes in Document Management - The transition to paperless operations means that many companies no longer have physical documents that show signs of wear, making it difficult to use this method for anomaly detection [18][22]. - Current practices often involve electronic approvals and digital records, which do not exhibit the same physical characteristics as traditional paper documents [23][24]. - The lack of physical document handling has led to a situation where even older contracts appear new, complicating the detection of anomalies [34]. Group 3: Practical Implications for Financial Oversight - Companies are encouraged to adapt their anomaly detection strategies to align with modern practices, focusing on the specifics of economic transactions rather than solely on document condition [17][35]. - The article emphasizes the importance of evolving with industry practices, as outdated methods may not provide significant insights in today's digital environment [35][36]. - Financial oversight should prioritize identifying potential fraud at its source rather than relying on post-factum detection methods [14].