交通运输部公布7月网约车数据：这些平台上榜

Core Insights - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the increasing importance of compliance rates as a key performance indicator for ride-hailing platforms, revealing significant disparities among leading companies and indicating a trend towards stricter regulatory oversight in the industry [10][16]. Summary by Sections Industry Overview - As of July 31, 2025, there are 392 licensed ride-hailing platforms in China, with a month-on-month increase of 3 platforms. The total number of orders processed in July reached 787 million, reflecting a 4% increase from the previous month [1]. Compliance Rates - The top 10 platforms by order volume are ranked by compliance rates, with "如祺出行" leading at 99.3%, followed by "旅程约车" at 98.7% and "喜行约车" at 95.4%. In contrast, "滴滴出行" and "花小猪出行" rank lower at 66.2% and 52.8% respectively, indicating challenges in maintaining compliance [3][10]. - Notably, "T3出行", "曹操出行", and "滴滴出行" showed the highest month-on-month growth in compliance rates, while "如祺出行", "花小猪出行", and "喜行约车" experienced declines [3][10]. Regional Compliance Variations - Major cities exhibit a "south high, north low" compliance pattern, with cities like Shenzhen, Guangzhou, and Hangzhou showing compliance rates above 80%. In contrast, northern cities such as Harbin and Urumqi struggle with lower compliance levels [6][13]. - The fastest improvements in compliance rates were observed in Urumqi, Shanghai, and Ningbo, while significant declines were noted in Kunming, Xiamen, and Lanzhou [14]. Industry Restructuring - A total of 97 ride-hailing platforms have not transmitted data for over 180 days, indicating a trend of "zombie platforms" being phased out. This reflects enhanced regulatory scrutiny and a shift towards a market dominated by capable players [15]. - The article emphasizes that compliance will become a long-term focus, impacting market access and financing capabilities for platforms with low compliance rates [16]. Future Trends and Recommendations - The article suggests that regulatory measures for aggregation platforms will likely tighten, requiring them to take on shared compliance responsibilities [17]. - It advocates for differentiated governance strategies to be implemented in northern and central-western cities, drawing from the successful experiences of southern cities [18]. - A recommendation is made to expedite the exit of non-operational platforms to free up regulatory resources and promote a healthier market environment [19].