Workflow
千人调查揭秘:85%学生都用AI,首要目的不是偷懒
Hu Xiu·2025-09-02 12:03

Core Insights - The article discusses the impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on higher education, highlighting both concerns and opportunities arising from its integration into academic settings [1][2][11]. Group 1: Student Perspectives - A significant portion of students, approximately 25%, believe in the value of their degrees despite the rise of AI, while half of the students using AI for writing express mixed feelings about its effects on learning and critical thinking [4][11]. - About 85% of students reported using Generative AI for coursework, primarily for brainstorming ideas (55%), asking questions like a tutor (50%), and studying for exams (46%) [12][13]. - Students are calling for guidance on AI usage rather than strict prohibitions, with 53% supporting education on responsible AI use [22][24]. Group 2: Academic Integrity and Cheating - The pressure to achieve good grades is seen as the primary reason for academic dishonesty, with 37% of students attributing it to this factor [18][19]. - Only 6% of students feel that professors clearly define policies regarding AI cheating, indicating a need for clearer guidelines [20]. - Students prefer educational approaches to AI usage over punitive measures, with 53% supporting the establishment of clear guidelines for AI tool usage [22][23]. Group 3: Faculty and AI Integration - Students exhibit mixed feelings about faculty using AI in teaching, with 29% cautiously supportive, provided that the process is transparent [28][31]. - Concerns about teaching quality and over-reliance on AI are prevalent, with 39% of students expressing worries [31]. - Faculty are encouraged to develop clear AI policies and consider alternative assessment methods to shift focus from grades to learning [71][74]. Group 4: Future of Education and Employment - Students express a desire for training on the professional and ethical use of AI tools, especially those already in the workforce, with 57% emphasizing this need [42][44]. - There is a notable divide in student opinions regarding the impact of AI on the value of their degrees, with 35% believing it remains unchanged and 23% feeling it has increased [45][49]. - The article suggests that while AI has not diminished the perceived value of higher education, it is reshaping how students evaluate that value [44][50].