Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal implications of misrepresentation in the sale of used cars, emphasizing the importance of accurate vehicle history disclosure by companies to consumers [2][3]. Group 1: Company Responsibilities - The company assured the buyer that the vehicle had "no accidents," which was interpreted as the vehicle not having any structural damage affecting its safety and normal use [3]. - The company claimed it was unaware of the vehicle's involvement in a fatal accident, arguing that the vehicle was in normal working condition and had no quality issues [2][3]. Group 2: Consumer Rights - The consumer, Mr. Zhang, argued that the vehicle's history of a fatal accident constituted a significant misrepresentation, affecting the vehicle's value and his purchasing decision [2][3]. - The court ruled in favor of the consumer, stating that the misrepresentation led to a significant misunderstanding, justifying the cancellation of the purchase contract and the return of the purchase price of 164,000 yuan [3]. Group 3: Legal Outcome - The court determined that the consumer's understanding of "no accidents" was fundamentally different from the reality of the vehicle's history, which warranted the contract's annulment [3]. - The company was ordered to refund the purchase price and handle the vehicle's registration changes accordingly [3].
购买了出过事故的二手车,能退吗?(以案说法)
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-09-03 23:32