Workflow
为什么游戏越来越不愿意公布配音演员了?
Hu Xiu·2025-09-04 02:19

Core Viewpoint - The gaming industry is witnessing a shift in the relationship between voice actors (CVs) and their characters, leading to a trend where companies are increasingly opting not to disclose CV names to mitigate risks associated with public scrutiny and player feedback [2][21][23]. Group 1: Events and Changes - The official announcement on August 30 revealed that the game "恋与制作人" ended its collaboration with voice actor Wu Lei after eight years due to concerns over his inconsistent performance [2][4]. - The decision to replace Wu Lei followed multiple rounds of player feedback and surveys regarding voice quality, ultimately leading to a resolution that may benefit all parties involved [5][21]. - Similar issues arose with the game "守望先锋," where the original CV Zhao Yang resigned after facing player criticism, prompting the company to seek a new voice actor [6][21]. Group 2: Industry Dynamics - The strong association between CVs and their characters has created a cycle of pressure, where dissatisfaction with a CV can lead to negative perceptions of the character itself, complicating the relationship between players, game developers, and voice actors [7][21]. - The trend of not publicly disclosing CV names is becoming more common, particularly in the context of games that rely heavily on character-driven narratives, as companies aim to reduce the potential for backlash against voice actors [22][23]. - The evolving role of CVs in the industry reflects a broader shift towards focusing on character development rather than individual voice actors, which may help alleviate public pressure and enhance player immersion [24][25]. Group 3: Implications for Voice Actors - While established CVs may not be significantly affected by this trend, the majority of new voice actors may face challenges in gaining recognition and opportunities in a more opaque industry environment [26]. - The potential for a "three-win" situation among players, companies, and CVs is noted, but it raises questions about fairness for emerging talent who may struggle to establish their identities in the industry [25][26].