关税政策被判非法，特朗普：坚决上诉，美国输不起

Group 1 - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that most of the global tariff policies implemented by President Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) are "illegal" [1][2] - Trump plans to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court, warning that a negative outcome could lead to the invalidation of existing trade agreements with major partners, potentially resulting in severe economic losses for the U.S. [1][2] - The IEEPA grants the President significant powers to respond to national emergencies or major threats from abroad, but the court clarified that these powers do not explicitly include the authority to impose tariffs [4][5] Group 2 - The court's decision emphasized that the imposition of tariffs is not within the President's authority, as fiscal powers, including taxation, belong to Congress [5] - Current tariff policies will remain in effect until October 14, allowing the Trump administration time to appeal [5] - The U.S. has collected approximately $159 billion in tariff revenue as of July this year, more than double the amount from the same period last year, indicating the financial implications of potential tariff removals [5] Group 3 - Trade experts suggest that Trump's statements are aimed at maximizing negotiation leverage, as the agreements with the EU and other partners are considered "framework agreements" rather than complete trade deals [6][7] - The composition of the Supreme Court, with a majority of Republican-appointed justices, may slightly increase the chances of Trump retaining some tariff policies, but the unprecedented nature of the case makes predictions difficult [7] - Criticism from Democratic leaders highlights the confusion surrounding the implications of overturning the tariff policies on existing trade agreements [8][9]