中印拒绝美国要求，继续购买俄油：俄方情报，北约准备大规模袭船

Group 1 - The article highlights the unexpected strong responses from China and India against the U.S. tariff strategy aimed at pressuring them to stop importing Russian oil, indicating a shift in international order dynamics [1][2][4] - China's firm stance, articulated by its foreign ministry, emphasizes that "there are no winners in a tariff war," while India initially paused its oil purchases but later reaffirmed its commitment to Russian energy cooperation [2][4] - The strategic decisions of China and India reflect their economic interests, particularly the cost advantages from discounted Russian oil and the establishment of direct currency settlement systems, undermining Western sanctions [2][4][7] Group 2 - The article discusses the broader implications of the U.S. tariff strategy, which has proven ineffective, as Russia's oil revenues have increased despite sanctions, and its military capabilities remain robust [4][6] - The planned maritime operations by the UK and NATO against Russian oil tankers represent a significant escalation, potentially disrupting international shipping norms and reflecting desperation in Western strategies [4][6] - The actions of China and India are reshaping the development rules for Global South countries, showcasing their strategic autonomy in the face of U.S. hegemony and leading to a potential shift towards de-dollarization in global energy trade [6][7][8] Group 3 - The article suggests that the next three months will be critical in determining the outcome of this global energy conflict, with uncertainties surrounding NATO's maritime plans and the security of Russian oil shipments [8] - The potential for a new type of warfare, extending beyond traditional military confrontations to include energy supply chains and financial systems, is emphasized as a defining characteristic of 21st-century conflicts [8]