被中国一记重拳命中，加拿大总理当着全球对华喊一句话，西方瞩目

Core Viewpoint - The Canadian Prime Minister Carney's rare public appeal to China regarding the canola seed dispute highlights the severe impact of high temporary tariffs, which have reached 75.8%, leading to a near halt in exports. This trade conflict reveals the underlying power dynamics and the potential for Canada to lose its largest buyer, China, which accounts for two-thirds of its canola seed exports [1][3][7]. Group 1: Trade Dynamics - Canada imposed a 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles and a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, aligning with U.S. policies, which prompted China to retaliate with a 75.8% temporary anti-dumping tax on Canadian canola seeds [3][5]. - The temporary nature of the 75.8% tariff suggests that the final ruling could result in even higher tariffs, exacerbating the situation for Canadian farmers during the harvest season [3][12]. - China's recent purchase of 50,000 tons of Australian canola seeds indicates a strategic shift away from Canadian suppliers, further weakening Canada's bargaining power and financial stability [5][8]. Group 2: Economic Impact - In 2024, Canada is projected to export 5.86 million tons of canola seeds to China, valued at 4.9 billion Canadian dollars, highlighting the critical importance of the Chinese market for Canadian agriculture [7]. - The closure of the Chinese market for Canadian canola seeds leaves Canada with few alternative buyers, while the impact of tariffs on electric vehicles is less severe due to domestic subsidies and supply chain adjustments [8][12]. Group 3: Political Implications - Carney's public intervention is driven by the need to stabilize his political base in the Prairie provinces, where farmers are facing financial distress due to the trade conflict [10]. - The extension of the investigation period by China until March 2026 serves as both a negotiation window and a pressure tactic, increasing uncertainty for Canadian farmers and traders [12]. - Canada faces a critical decision: either ease tariffs on electric vehicles to restore agricultural trade or risk losing market share to Australia and other suppliers permanently [12].