内幕交易没有任何借口

Core Viewpoint - The recent penalty for insider trading highlights the strict enforcement of regulations against such practices, emphasizing that any involvement in insider trading, regardless of intent, will lead to severe consequences [1][2]. Group 1: Insider Trading Penalty Case - A recent case involved an individual, Li, who was penalized for insider trading after using confidential information overheard in the office to trade shares of Qitian Technology, resulting in a profit of 260,000 yuan from a 300,000 yuan investment [1]. - The argument of unintentional information acquisition was rejected, reinforcing the principle that insider trading must be punished to maintain market integrity [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The law defines insider trading based on objective criteria, meaning that knowledge of insider information and subsequent trading constitutes a violation, regardless of the individual's intent [2]. - The regulatory body aims to maintain market fairness by imposing high penalties on violators, as the current legal framework has already increased the costs associated with insider trading [2]. Group 3: Broader Implications and Responsibilities - The responsibility to combat insider trading extends beyond regulators; ordinary investors must be cautious of insider information and avoid engaging in unethical trading practices [3]. - Companies are encouraged to implement strict information confidentiality protocols to prevent internal misconduct, while intermediaries should maintain independence to avoid facilitating insider information leaks [3].