美国关税战成笑话？特朗普收到坏消息，与此同时全美千场抗议爆发

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) are largely illegal, with a buffer period until October 14 for the Supreme Court to make a final decision [1][3] Group 1: Legal and Political Context - The ruling emphasizes that fiscal authority lies with Congress, and the IEEPA does not grant the president the power to impose tariffs [3][4] - The courts have indicated that the tariffs cover nearly all imported goods, with high rates and no clear end date, exceeding the capacity of the U.S. tariff system [3][5] - The White House maintains that the president's actions are legal and necessary for national and economic security, showing no signs of backing down [3][5] Group 2: Market Reactions - Following the court's ruling, the stock market reacted negatively, with major indices dropping significantly [3] - Analysts suggest that even if the Supreme Court sides with the lower courts, tariffs may still persist under different legal frameworks, such as national security investigations [4][5] Group 3: Economic Implications - Tariff revenues have reportedly surged, with collections nearing $100 billion from April to July, representing over 8% of federal revenue at peak [5][12] - If the court's decision is upheld, companies may seek refunds for tariffs, leading to significant fiscal challenges for the Treasury [5][12] - The uncertainty surrounding tariffs could jeopardize existing trade agreements and investments, particularly affecting negotiations with countries like India, which has seen a 50% tariff increase [5][6] Group 4: Domestic Impact - The imposition of tariffs and immigration policies has exacerbated labor shortages in sectors like agriculture and construction, contributing to persistent inflation [8][9] - Protests have erupted among various labor groups, reflecting discontent over economic conditions and perceived overreach of executive power [8][9] Group 5: Future Considerations - The tightening of IEEPA's interpretation may require more rigorous procedures for imposing tariffs, potentially slowing down the process [9][10] - The market anticipates that the U.S. may shift towards more targeted industry-specific tariffs rather than broad measures, which could mitigate political backlash [12]