Amazon fires 150 unionized third-party drivers, Teamsters says

Core Viewpoint - Amazon has terminated over 150 unionized drivers from a third-party contractor in Queens, New York, which the Teamsters union claims is retaliation for unionizing [1][2] Group 1: Company Actions - Amazon's recent termination of drivers is part of a strategy to allow delivery service providers (DSPs) to manage their teams more effectively [3] - The company has previously faced allegations of unfair labor practices, including a ruling by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regarding another DSP, Battle-Tested Strategies, which also involved unionized drivers [4][5] - Amazon has appealed the NLRB's ruling that deemed it a joint employer of the drivers [5] Group 2: Union Response - The Teamsters union has organized protests and strikes among Amazon workers, advocating for better pay and working conditions [5] - Union representatives assert that Amazon's actions are illegal and emphasize their commitment to continue organizing for workers' rights [2] Group 3: Legal Context - Amazon has challenged the constitutionality of the NLRB's structure, arguing that its board members cannot be removed by the president, which has implications for labor dispute rulings [6] - The NLRB currently lacks a quorum to rule on major labor disputes due to unfilled positions, affecting its ability to address ongoing issues [6]