Core Viewpoint - The Guangzhou Internet Court ruled on a case involving a minor's game recharge, highlighting the responsibilities of both parents and gaming companies in preventing unauthorized transactions by minors [1] Group 1: Case Details - A 14-year-old middle school student, referred to as Xiao Li, used a parent-verified payment account to recharge a game 552 times, totaling over 370,000 yuan [1] - The parents discovered the charges and filed a lawsuit seeking a refund, arguing that the gaming company should be responsible for the unauthorized transactions [1] - The gaming company contended that the account and payment method were verified as adult, thus considering the transactions legitimate and claiming compliance with anti-addiction regulations [1] Group 2: Court Findings - The court determined that the recharge patterns aligned with typical behavior of minors, confirming that Xiao Li was the one making the transactions [1] - The judge noted that the parents failed to adequately safeguard account information and did not notice the unusual activity for an extended period, indicating a significant lapse in their supervisory duties [1] - The gaming company's identity verification process was deemed overly simplistic, failing to effectively prevent minors from misusing adult identities for recharges [1] Group 3: Final Ruling - The court concluded that both parties shared responsibility for the situation, ordering the gaming company to refund over 120,000 yuan to the parents [1]
初中生偷转父母37万元充值游戏,家长起诉要求退款,法院判了!
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-09-10 10:02