印度抵制全面加密货币监管框架，担心系统性风险

Core Viewpoint - The Indian government is inclined to maintain a limited regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies rather than establishing comprehensive legislation, primarily due to concerns about systemic risks posed by digital assets to the financial system [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Approach - The Indian government's core concern is that detailed regulations for cryptocurrencies may inadvertently legitimize them, attracting more capital and potentially threatening the stability of the entire financial system [2]. - A complete ban on cryptocurrencies is seen as flawed, as it would not effectively address peer-to-peer transactions and decentralized finance activities [2]. - The current limited regulatory clarity helps control the risks posed by cryptocurrencies to the regulated financial system, while existing tax laws deter speculative trading and penalize fraud and illegal activities [2][3]. Group 2: Market Impact - India's residents have invested approximately $4.5 billion in various cryptocurrencies, which has not yet posed significant or systemic risks to financial stability [1][2]. - The Indian government allows global cryptocurrency exchanges to operate locally after registration, but imposes high taxes to suppress speculative trading [1]. Group 3: External Influences - Recent developments in stablecoin regulation in the U.S., particularly the signing of the GENIUS Act, have prompted India to conduct a cautious assessment of its own regulatory stance [3]. - The Indian government expresses concerns that the widespread use of stablecoins could disrupt the national payment system and undermine the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) system [3]. Group 4: Global Context - India's regulatory stance is shaped by significant global divergence in cryptocurrency regulation, making it challenging to establish a clear path forward or unified policy approach [4]. - The Indian government's position has evolved over time, having previously considered banning private cryptocurrencies but later calling for a global regulatory framework during its G20 presidency [5]. - Future adjustments to India's stance may occur as international stablecoin regulatory frameworks develop and as various countries evolve their industry policies [5].