最高法发布反垄断典型案例 认定首例滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争案件

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China released five typical antitrust cases, addressing significant legal issues related to the abuse of administrative power to eliminate and restrict competition, price-fixing, market division, and monopolistic behaviors by industry associations [1] Group 1: Antitrust Cases - The case involving "shared electric bicycles" is the first recognized by the Supreme Court as an abuse of administrative power to eliminate and restrict competition [1] - A bike rental service provider, referred to as Company Q, filed an administrative lawsuit against a local administrative approval bureau and a city big data center for unlawfully establishing and implementing a franchise for shared electric bicycles [1] - The Supreme Court's second-instance ruling found that the local administrative approval bureau lacked legal basis for setting up franchise rights in the shared electric bicycle sector, exceeding its authority [1] Group 2: Legal Implications - The court determined that there was insufficient evidence to prove that revoking the contested administrative actions would harm national interests or public welfare, leading to the annulment of the contested administrative behavior [1]