Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court released five typical antitrust cases, addressing issues such as abuse of administrative power to eliminate and restrict competition, price-fixing, and market division among industry associations [1] - The case involving "shared electric bicycles" marks the first instance recognized by the Supreme Court for abuse of administrative power to eliminate and restrict competition [1] - The internet rental bicycle service provider, referred to as Company Q, filed an administrative lawsuit against a local administrative approval bureau and a city big data center for unlawfully establishing and implementing a franchise for shared electric bicycles [1] Group 2 - The Supreme Court's second-instance ruling determined that the local administrative approval bureau lacked legal basis and exceeded its authority in setting up franchise rights in the shared electric bicycle sector [1] - The court found insufficient evidence to prove that revoking the contested administrative actions would harm national interests or public welfare, leading to the annulment of the contested administrative behavior [1]
最高法发布反垄断典型案例
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-09-10 22:13