高伟达股价跌6.1%，华宝基金旗下1只基金位居十大流通股东，持有265.51万股浮亏损失411.54万元

Company Overview - Gao Weida Software Co., Ltd. is located in Chaoyang District, Beijing, and was established on April 11, 2003. The company went public on May 28, 2015. Its main business involves providing IT solutions, IT operation services, and system integration services primarily to financial enterprises such as banks, insurance companies, and securities firms. The revenue composition is as follows: software development and services account for 91.95%, while system integration and services account for 8.05% [1]. Stock Performance - On September 11, Gao Weida's stock fell by 6.1%, trading at 23.84 CNY per share, with a transaction volume of 169 million CNY and a turnover rate of 1.56%. The total market capitalization is 10.579 billion CNY [1]. Shareholder Information - Among the top ten circulating shareholders of Gao Weida, a fund under Huabao Fund holds a significant position. The Huabao CSI Financial Technology Theme ETF (159851) increased its holdings by 200,200 shares in the second quarter, bringing its total to 2.6551 million shares, which represents 0.6% of the circulating shares. The estimated floating loss today is approximately 4.1154 million CNY [2]. Fund Performance - The Huabao CSI Financial Technology Theme ETF (159851) was established on March 4, 2021, and currently has a total scale of 5.731 billion CNY. Year-to-date, it has achieved a return of 26.46%, ranking 1462 out of 4222 in its category. Over the past year, the return is 142.56%, ranking 23 out of 3798. Since its inception, the return is 81.02% [2]. Fund Management - The fund managers of the Huabao CSI Financial Technology Theme ETF are Chen Jianhua and Cao Xucheng. As of the latest update, Chen Jianhua has a cumulative tenure of 12 years and 267 days, managing assets totaling 15.533 billion CNY, with the best fund return during his tenure being 159.42% and the worst being -49.65%. Cao Xucheng has a tenure of 113 days, managing assets of 22.018 billion CNY, with the best return of 71.4% and the worst return of 6.29% during his tenure [3].