共享基经丨同名ETF对比（八）：绿电ETF、能源ETF，跟踪的指数有何不同？

Group 1: Green Energy ETFs - There are two ETFs named Green Energy ETF, one managed by Guotai Fund tracking the Guozheng Green Power Index, and the other managed by Huaxia Fund tracking the Zhongzheng Green Power Index [2][3] - The Guozheng Green Power Index consists of 50 stocks with an average market capitalization of approximately 533 billion, while the Zhongzheng Green Power Index also has 50 stocks with an average market capitalization of about 530 billion [2][3] - Both indices share 38 common stocks, with 12 unique stocks in each index [4] - The performance comparison shows that the Guozheng Green Power Index performed better in the past year, while the Zhongzheng Green Power Index has a significantly higher annualized return over the past five years [7] - The current valuation indicates that the Guozheng Green Power Index's TTM P/E ratio is above the historical 50th percentile, while the Zhongzheng Green Power Index's TTM P/E ratio is around the historical 35th percentile [8] Group 2: Energy ETFs - There are two ETFs named Energy ETF, one managed by Huitianfu Fund tracking the Zhongzheng Energy Index, and the other managed by ICBC Credit Suisse Fund tracking the Zhongzheng National New State-Owned Enterprises Modern Energy Index [11][12] - The Zhongzheng Energy Index consists of 25 stocks with an average market capitalization of approximately 279 billion, while the Zhongzheng National New State-Owned Enterprises Modern Energy Index has 50 stocks with an average market capitalization of about 345 billion [11][12] - The two indices share only 10 common stocks, with 15 unique stocks in the Zhongzheng Energy Index and 40 unique stocks in the Zhongzheng National New State-Owned Enterprises Modern Energy Index [13] - The performance comparison indicates that the Zhongzheng National New State-Owned Enterprises Modern Energy Index has shown greater gains over the past year, with a TTM P/E ratio above the historical 70th percentile, while the Zhongzheng Energy Index's TTM P/E ratio is below the historical 40th percentile [17][20]