广州开展涉企行政执法监督检查重点纠治扰企突出问题

Core Insights - The article highlights the increased transparency and accountability in administrative law enforcement for businesses in Guangzhou, particularly in the Huadu District, where issues of corruption and misconduct among enforcement personnel have been addressed [1][2][3]. Group 1: Administrative Oversight and Enforcement - The Guangzhou Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has initiated a series of measures to tackle corruption and misconduct in grassroots administrative law enforcement, resulting in the investigation of 489 corruption and misconduct cases and the handling of 648 individuals, with 256 receiving disciplinary actions this year [2]. - The Huadu District has seen a focus on addressing issues such as "eating, taking, and demanding" among enforcement personnel, with 170 individuals investigated and 110 cases filed over the past two years [2]. - The introduction of a "bright code" system for administrative inspections aims to enhance transparency, allowing businesses to verify the credentials of enforcement personnel through a digital platform [5]. Group 2: Case Studies and Specific Incidents - A specific case involved an enforcement officer in Huadu who was found to have accepted benefits from a management service company while improperly promoting their services to local businesses, leading to disciplinary action against the officer [1]. - In Tianhe District, an enforcement officer was penalized for using excessive inspection frequency to pressure a property management company into compliance with a rental project, demonstrating the ongoing issues of misconduct in administrative enforcement [3]. Group 3: Systematic Improvements and Recommendations - The Guangzhou Municipal Commission has issued 47 disciplinary recommendations and has pushed for the establishment of 34 new regulations to improve administrative law enforcement practices [4]. - The Huadu District has developed 17 new administrative enforcement regulations, including guidelines for auxiliary personnel, to standardize enforcement practices and improve operational efficiency [4].