预制菜，又摊上事了

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xibei over the definition and use of prepared dishes has escalated, drawing significant public attention and impacting Xibei's business [1][3][4]. Group 1: Company Responses - Luo Yonghao initiated the controversy with a social media post, leading to Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, announcing plans to sue him for defamation [1][3]. - Jia Guolong emphasized that Xibei does not use prepared dishes but rather "pre-processed ingredients," aiming to clarify the company's position [2][4]. - Following the backlash, Xibei opened its kitchen for media visits and shared its cooking processes to demonstrate transparency [4][7]. Group 2: Financial Impact - The controversy has reportedly led to a significant decline in Xibei's revenue, with a loss of over 2 million yuan in a single day [3]. - Jia Guolong acknowledged that the pricing strategy of Xibei has faced criticism, admitting past mistakes that contributed to the perception of Xibei as expensive [12][16]. Group 3: Industry Context - The debate centers around the definition of "prepared dishes," with many consumers equating any non-cooked meal as prepared, despite regulatory definitions differing [4][10]. - The prevalence of prepared dishes in the restaurant industry is increasing, with many chains reportedly using them to streamline operations and maintain consistency [24]. - Luo Yonghao's comments highlighted the need for transparency in the prepared dish industry, advocating for consumer awareness regarding food sourcing and preparation methods [27][30]. Group 4: Consumer Sentiment - Consumer trust is a critical issue, with many willing to accept higher prices if they believe the quality justifies the cost [13][16]. - The public's perception of Xibei's pricing and quality has been a longstanding topic of discussion, with many consumers expressing dissatisfaction with the value offered [10][12]. - The relationship between consumers and restaurants is complex, with transparency and quality being key factors in maintaining trust [20][34].