创业补贴贵在精准（纵横）

Core Viewpoint - The emergence of "agency university student entrepreneurship subsidies" on social media has led to the exploitation of students by unscrupulous intermediaries, creating a "black market" for these subsidies that undermines the original intent of the policy [1][2]. Group 1: Issues with Subsidy Agencies - Some intermediaries lure students with promises of "high subsidies," "zero thresholds," and "freebies," while engaging in fraudulent practices such as forging business licenses and fabricating entrepreneurial projects [1]. - These agencies charge exorbitant "service fees" and even encourage students to submit false documentation, which not only depletes graduates' finances but also violates the goodwill of the policy [1]. Group 2: Policy Execution Challenges - There are significant gaps in the execution of subsidy policies, particularly in the "last mile" from policy announcement to implementation, with multiple departments involved leading to confusion and inefficiency [1]. - In some regions, the application process is cumbersome, requiring applicants to navigate various channels and unclear material requirements, which forces entrepreneurs to rely on market intermediaries [1]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To realign the subsidies with their original purpose, a dual approach of "blocking and unblocking" is recommended, which includes streamlining the application process and integrating resources into a unified entrepreneurial service platform [2]. - The use of big data technology is suggested to establish a cross-departmental verification mechanism to monitor the authenticity of entrepreneurial projects and to impose strict penalties on non-compliant intermediaries [2].