Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to reduce burdens on grassroots workers by supporting and encouraging those who take action [2] - Recent measures have been implemented to standardize assessments and reduce evaluation indicators, yet some regions still engage in frequent ranking announcements, which adds unnecessary pressure on grassroots officials [2] - The document from the Central Committee and the State Council clearly states that frequent monthly or quarterly ranking announcements are prohibited, aiming to avoid cumbersome evaluations and promote effective performance [2] Group 2 - There is a concern that some departments equate the presentation of work, such as through PPTs, with actual work performance, leading to a focus on form over substance [3] - The pursuit of elaborate presentations can detract from actual work, as officials may spend more time on aesthetics rather than engaging with the community and addressing real issues [3] - Digital tools should be viewed as means to an end, not the end itself, highlighting the need to eliminate superficial practices in grassroots work [3] Group 3 - Training for officials is intended to empower the workforce, but often devolves into mere procedural tasks without tangible outcomes [4] - The phenomenon of "training for training's sake" results in ineffective sessions that do not address the actual needs of the participants [4] - To enhance training effectiveness, it is crucial to align training content with the real needs of officials, incorporating practical and relevant learning experiences [4][5]
这些形式主义要根治(大家谈·持之以恒为基层减负⑥)
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-09-14 22:03