反对预制菜,就是反对工业文明?
Hu Xiu·2025-09-14 23:33

Core Viewpoint - The article presents a nuanced perspective on the pre-prepared meal industry, highlighting its potential benefits while acknowledging public skepticism and cultural resistance towards industrialized food products [1][6][23]. Group 1: Industry Benefits - The pre-prepared meal industry can benefit all participants in the supply chain, including consumers, by providing stable demand for agricultural products and reducing waste through local processing [8]. - The industry facilitates restaurant expansion and addresses employment issues by allowing for standardized processes that require less specialized skills, thus creating more job opportunities [9][10]. - For busy urban consumers, pre-prepared meals offer a convenient solution for quick, quality dining, especially during hectic evenings [11]. Group 2: Cultural and Psychological Resistance - Public distrust towards pre-prepared meals stems from a lack of transparency in production processes, leading to a psychological barrier against industrialized food [15][19]. - The cultural significance of home-cooked meals and the sensory experience associated with traditional cooking methods contribute to skepticism towards pre-prepared options [18][23]. - Historical food safety issues in China have exacerbated distrust in industrial food products, making pre-prepared meals a target for broader concerns about food safety and quality [19][21]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The rapid modernization in China has created a clash between traditional culinary practices and the efficiency-driven pre-prepared meal industry, resulting in cultural shock and resistance [21]. - The availability of fresh produce at low costs in urban markets presents a direct challenge to the pre-prepared meal market, as consumers may question the value of paying more for convenience [22]. - The article emphasizes the need for consumers to critically evaluate the transparency, standards, and pricing of pre-prepared meals rather than relying on emotional responses [30].