Core Viewpoint - The legitimacy of stablecoins does not equate to their universal acceptance in payment scenarios, as they serve merely as intermediaries for currency payments and are not legal tender [2][3]. Regulatory Environment - Stablecoins have been circulating in markets prior to the enactment of related regulations in the US, Hong Kong, and the EU, and their legal status may change post-regulation [3]. - The introduction of regulations aims to address the risks associated with stablecoins while recognizing their beneficial roles in the economy [3]. Application Scenarios - Stablecoins are not universally applicable; their use is limited to specific scenarios where legal tender is inconvenient or unavailable [9][11]. - Current primary use cases for stablecoins include virtual world payments, cross-border transactions to evade sanctions, and as a hedge against local currency instability [9][10]. Market Dynamics - The market for stablecoins is expected to shift significantly post-legalization, with a focus on mainstream payment scenarios such as retail, domestic, and cross-border trade [11]. - Retail payment scenarios may include large merchants issuing their own stablecoins, but widespread acceptance across different merchants is unlikely [12][13]. Technological Integration - The integration of blockchain technology in financial transactions is essential, but stablecoins may not be the optimal solution for all payment needs [19][20]. - The potential for tokenized financial instruments, such as bills of exchange, may offer more advantages than stablecoins in certain contexts [20]. Future Trends - Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are expected to outperform stablecoins in similar regulatory environments due to their status as legal tender [21]. - The future of stablecoins will depend on the evolution of transaction models, regulatory approaches, and technological advancements [21].
稳定币合法化后有哪些发展路径
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-09-15 01:52