Group 1 - The core argument is that the likelihood of the US and EU jointly imposing high tariffs on China is low due to the significant economic repercussions they would face domestically [1][10][11] - China's manufacturing sector holds a dominant position globally, accounting for approximately 33% of global manufacturing output, which is about $5.7 trillion, surpassing both the US and EU individually [3][4] - Historical context shows that previous tariff increases led to significant market reactions, with the US stock market declining and China’s stock market rebounding, indicating the interconnectedness of their economies [4][6] Group 2 - The internal conflicts between the US and EU complicate their ability to unite against China, as evidenced by the EU's dissatisfaction with trade agreements that favor the US [6][8] - Both the US and EU rely heavily on Chinese goods, with overlapping demand for key products, making it difficult to find alternative suppliers [8][9] - The ongoing high inflation in the US and EU poses a significant risk; imposing tariffs could exacerbate inflation, leading to public discontent and political repercussions [10][11] Group 3 - China's strong relationships with ASEAN and other regions provide it with a robust economic backing, contrasting with the US and EU's interdependent and often conflicting relationship [7][8] - The time required to rebuild manufacturing capabilities in the US and EU means they are not prepared to sever ties with China, as establishing new production facilities takes years [9][10]
中国反制有多狠?欧美承担不起联合对中国大帨加征关税的代价!
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-09-15 09:13