9月15日特讯！特朗普要求北约对华加税，外交部强势回应引爆国际舆论

Group 1 - The U.S. is attempting to form a "tariff alliance" against China, leveraging the issue of Chinese imports of Russian oil to pressure China in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict [3][5] - China's Foreign Ministry has strongly opposed unilateral bullying and economic coercion, emphasizing its commitment to defending its legitimate rights and interests [5][6] - The U.S. strategy to involve NATO in economic sanctions against China is seen as unreasonable and reflects strategic anxiety, as many European countries have expressed reluctance to decouple from China [6][10] Group 2 - The narrative of "de-risking" by the West is pushing the world towards new risks, potentially increasing inflation and destabilizing the international economic order [9][10] - China has developed a comprehensive countermeasure system and alternative market networks over the past few years, enhancing its influence in international multilateral frameworks [10][15] - The international response includes skepticism from European media regarding the U.S. turning NATO into an economic weapon, and support from developing countries viewing this as a reaction of old powers to rising new forces [11][13] Group 3 - The potential re-ignition of trade conflicts by the U.S. is likely to undermine its credibility and encourage other nations to seek alternatives, as evidenced by the outcomes of the previous U.S.-China trade war [15] - China's diplomatic stance is characterized by a calm yet firm approach, indicating readiness for dialogue but also preparedness for confrontation if necessary [15]