jiangsu leili(SZ:300660) Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-09-16 03:34Core Insights - Jiangsu Leili's stock price increased by 5.89% on September 16, reaching 57.50 CNY per share, with a trading volume of 1.113 billion CNY and a turnover rate of 4.46%, resulting in a total market capitalization of 25.71 billion CNY [1] - The stock has seen a cumulative increase of 5.44% over the past three days [1] Company Overview - Jiangsu Leili Electric Co., Ltd. was established on April 29, 2006, and went public on June 2, 2017 [1] - The company is located in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, and its main business includes the research, production, and sales of household appliances, automotive micro-special motors, intelligent components for medical instruments, industrial control motors and components, and related parts [1] Revenue Composition - The revenue breakdown of Jiangsu Leili is as follows: - Stepper motors: 31.65% - MA motors and components: 22.70% - DC motors: 14.07% - Pumps: 10.66% - PP-stamped parts: 5.30% - Drainage motors: 4.82% - Die-cast parts: 4.42% - Others: 4.30% - Synchronous motors: 2.08% [1] Fund Holdings - CITIC Prudential Fund holds a significant position in Jiangsu Leili, with its CITIC Prudential CSI Smart Home Index (LOF) A fund (165524) owning 16,800 shares, accounting for 1.11% of the fund's net value, making it the third-largest holding [2] - The fund has generated an estimated floating profit of approximately 53,800 CNY today, with a total floating profit of 47,000 CNY during the three-day increase [2] Fund Performance - The CITIC Prudential CSI Smart Home Index (LOF) A fund was established on January 1, 2021, with a current scale of 45.4554 million CNY [2] - Year-to-date return is 32.11%, ranking 1404 out of 4222 in its category; the one-year return is 99.61%, ranking 437 out of 3804; since inception, it has a loss of 17.66% [2] - The fund manager, Huang Zhi, has been in the position for 7 years and 56 days, managing total assets of 3.01 billion CNY, with the best return during the tenure being 146.63% and the worst being -18.08% [2]