商务部连发两大公告，中美新一轮会谈前交锋，或退出中美经贸谈判

Group 1 - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce initiated anti-dumping investigations against U.S. imported analog chips and highlighted discriminatory barriers against Chinese integrated circuits [1][3] - The timing of these announcements coincided with a planned meeting between Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and U.S. Treasury Secretary, indicating a strategic response rather than a spontaneous action [3][5] - The import volume of U.S. analog chips to China surged by 37% from 2022 to 2024, while prices plummeted by 52%, with dumping margins from U.S. companies like Texas Instruments reaching 300%-450% [3][5] Group 2 - China's response is characterized as a counter-strategy to U.S. tactics of using low prices to undermine Chinese industries, signaling that negotiations can occur but must be free of unilateral sanctions [5][9] - The U.S. has added 13 Chinese companies to its "entity list," a tactic seen as a pressure tool to gain leverage in negotiations [7][9] - China publicly questioned the U.S. actions before the talks, indicating that such maneuvers could jeopardize the negotiations [9][11] Group 3 - China's approach is grounded in legal frameworks and international trade rules, asserting that U.S. practices violate World Trade Organization regulations [14][18] - The anti-dumping investigation is based on evidence that U.S. companies are selling chips at unreasonably low prices to eliminate local competition [16][18] - The U.S. has been accused of undermining free trade principles, while China positions itself as a defender of these rules [20][22] Group 4 - China's confidence in its negotiating position stems from its large market, growing industrial capabilities, and the wavering support of U.S. allies [23][26] - China is the largest buyer of chips globally, with over half of U.S. analog chip sales reliant on the Chinese market, making it a critical player for U.S. companies [23][25] - The shift in the global supply chain dynamics has reduced China's dependency on U.S. technology, with significant improvements in domestic production capabilities [28][30] Group 5 - The U.S. strategy of rallying allies against China is facing challenges, as countries like the EU and Japan are hesitant to sacrifice their economic ties with China [30][32] - China's recent actions signal a new baseline for negotiations, emphasizing equality and mutual respect, moving away from coercive tactics [32][34] - The expectation that the U.S. can intimidate China into concessions is no longer viable, indicating a shift in the balance of power in negotiations [34]