航司大比例“锁座”，为何变本加厉？

Core Viewpoint - The practice of "paid seat selection" by airlines has become a controversial industry norm, with increasing instances of "locking" seats that require additional fees or points for selection, despite having already sold tickets based on seat class [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Trends - The average daily ticket booking volume for domestic flights during the upcoming National Day holiday has increased by over 25% compared to the same period last year [1]. - The number of airlines implementing "seat locking" has grown, with a notable increase in the proportion of locked seats [1]. - For example, on a flight from Osaka Kansai to Beijing Capital, only 116 out of approximately 300 seats were available for selection, with only 14 of those being free [1]. Group 2: Consumer Rights and Legal Issues - The practice of locking a large number of seats infringes on passengers' rights to know and choose, as it effectively monetizes their autonomy in seat selection [2][4]. - Legal experts have indicated that the widespread "paid seat selection" practices may violate multiple laws, including regulations on public air transport services, consumer rights protection, and pricing laws [4]. - Consumers are encouraged to assert their rights and can potentially initiate public interest lawsuits against airlines for these practices [4]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and Reactions - Discussions on social media regarding the necessity of purchasing a seat after buying a ticket have garnered over ten million views, indicating widespread dissatisfaction [2]. - Many travelers express frustration over the inability to select preferred seats, which can disrupt family seating arrangements and overall travel experience [4].