“防火墙”暂时保住 美联储独立性危机引发连锁反应

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to dismiss Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook, reinforcing the independence of the Federal Reserve and its ability to conduct monetary policy without political interference [1][4]. Group 1: Impact on Federal Reserve Independence - The ruling upholds the principle of protection for independent agency officials established in the 1935 Humphrey's Executor case, delineating the legal boundaries of presidential power [1]. - The case reflects ongoing challenges to the Federal Reserve's policy independence, as internal conflicts may arise from the Senate's confirmation of new board members [1][4]. Group 2: Implications for the U.S. Dollar and Global Economy - The potential for political interference in monetary policy could lead to a decline in investor confidence in U.S. dollar assets, resulting in capital outflows and depreciation of the dollar [4]. - Increased long-term borrowing costs could exacerbate the interest burden on U.S. government debt, while accelerating the trend of de-dollarization globally [4]. - The ruling sends a signal that Federal Reserve policies are not subject to political manipulation, temporarily stabilizing the dollar's status as a global reserve currency [4]. Group 3: Broader Political Context - The situation highlights the fragility of American democratic institutions and the ongoing struggle between administrative power and independent agencies [5][7]. - The ultimate resolution of this issue may depend on a future ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court, which could have significant implications for the relationship between executive power and independent institutions [7].