Workflow
西山科技涉仲裁案件 两起仲裁合计主张约3571万元赔偿

Core Viewpoint - Chongqing Xishan Technology Co., Ltd. is involved in arbitration matters, with the arbitration tribunal having accepted the case but not yet convened. The company is one of the respondents and may bear joint liability for compensation [1] Group 1: Arbitration Details - The company has received materials related to two arbitration cases from the Beijing Arbitration Commission, with the claimants being China National Pharmaceutical Group United Medical Devices Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Guoyao United") and China National Pharmaceutical Group Beijing United Meidi Medical Devices Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Guoyao Beijing United Meidi") [2] - In the first arbitration case, Guoyao United claims that it is not at fault for the pricing issues related to medical supplies delivered to 301 Hospital, which were found to exceed the national minimum price, and seeks joint compensation of 20.300398 million yuan and legal fees of 630,000 yuan from the respondents [2] - In the second arbitration case, Guoyao Beijing United Meidi similarly claims it is not responsible for the pricing issues and seeks joint compensation of 14.2746 million yuan and legal fees of 509,400 yuan from the respondents [2] Group 2: Company Response - The company's board has begun organizing defense materials and has hired a professional legal team to actively respond to the arbitration [3] - The company asserts that the pricing of the medical supplies in question was in line with commercial practices and found no evidence of inflated prices [3] - Initial legal consultations suggest that the arbitration cases are not expected to have a significant impact on the company's daily operations [3]