中方刚说完，美财长就出手：一边谈合作，一边让欧洲加税

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the contrasting approaches of China and the U.S. during the recent economic talks in Madrid, where China expressed a willingness to cooperate while the U.S. quickly shifted to pressuring European allies to impose tariffs on Chinese goods [1][21][28] - The talks focused on key issues such as technology exports, investment environment, and bilateral trade cooperation, with China indicating a readiness to handle export approvals legally and addressing sensitive topics like TikTok without making concessions [5][21][28] - The atmosphere of the talks was noted to be less tense compared to previous encounters, with China aiming for open communication rather than covert competition, while the U.S. Treasury Secretary's immediate response was to rally European support against China [7][14][21] Group 2 - The U.S. Treasury Secretary's comments suggested a clear expectation for European nations to join in applying pressure on China, indicating that the U.S. feels it cannot tackle economic competition with China alone [9][13][25] - European countries face a dilemma as they have varying stances on China, with some advocating for cooperation while others are more cautious, and any move to impose tariffs could adversely affect their own economies [14][16][26] - The article emphasizes that the ongoing U.S.-China economic tensions could have far-reaching implications for global supply chains and consumer prices, highlighting the interconnectedness of the global economy [18][30] Group 3 - The article concludes that while the Madrid talks did not resolve all issues, they opened a channel for future communication, with China maintaining a firm stance on its principles while the U.S. appears more focused on external alliances to exert pressure [21][23][28] - The narrative suggests that the U.S. is inclined to politicize economic issues, which may create short-term advantages but is unlikely to alter the fundamental dynamics of global trade in the long run [25][30] - The need for clear rules and boundaries in international relations is underscored, as both cooperation and confrontation must be approached with caution to avoid escalating tensions that could impact the global economy [30][31]