北京知识产权法院深化总结创新 提升审判质效——发挥调查官作用 办好技术类案件

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the role of technical investigators in resolving complex intellectual property disputes, particularly in the technology sector, highlighting a case involving two competing companies in the autonomous driving field [1][2]. Group 1: Case Overview - Beijing A Technology Company, a leading player in autonomous driving, sued B Technology Company for allegedly infringing on its core algorithms and software [1]. - B Technology Company counter-sued, claiming A Technology's lawsuit was malicious, initiated at a critical financing time [1]. - The complexity of the case required a clear identification of technical disputes, necessitating the involvement of neutral technical investigators [1]. Group 2: Role of Technical Investigators - Technical investigators assisted in clarifying technical facts, enabling targeted discussions between the parties [2]. - Their involvement helped transform complex technical facts into clear legal facts, enhancing the precision of judicial decisions [2]. - The presence of technical investigators has led to a significant increase in the number of resolved technical cases, with annual case closures rising from 1,430 in 2016 to 4,524 in 2024, a 216% increase [2]. Group 3: Innovations in Technical Investigation - The Beijing Intellectual Property Court has explored a "dual technical investigator" model for major or interdisciplinary cases to improve accuracy in fact-finding [3]. - A mechanism for "simplified and complex" participation of technical investigators has been established, allowing for tailored involvement based on case complexity [3]. - The court has formed an expert committee comprising academicians to enhance the professional capacity of technical investigators [3]. Group 4: Future Directions - The Beijing Intellectual Property Court plans to continue refining the operation of the technical investigator system to improve the quality and efficiency of adjudicating technical cases [4].