Starbucks workers sue over company's new dress code

Core Viewpoint - Starbucks workers in three states have initiated legal action against the company, claiming it unlawfully changed its dress code without reimbursing employees for necessary clothing purchases [1][6][13]. Group 1: Legal Actions - Employees have filed class-action lawsuits in state courts in Illinois and Colorado, and complaints with California's Labor and Workforce Development Agency [1][2][9]. - If the California agency does not pursue penalties against Starbucks, workers plan to file a class-action lawsuit in California [2]. Group 2: Dress Code Changes - Starbucks implemented a new dress code on May 12, requiring all North American workers to wear solid black shirts under green aprons, with specific guidelines for bottoms and shoes [3][4][5]. - The new dress code prohibits face tattoos, multiple facial piercings, tongue piercings, and "theatrical makeup" [7]. - The previous dress code allowed for more self-expression, including patterned shirts and a wider variety of colors [8]. Group 3: Employee Experiences - Employees have reported incurring personal expenses to comply with the new dress code, with one employee spending $60.09 on compliant shoes and an additional $86.95 on work clothes [11][12]. - Workers have expressed frustration over the expectation to redesign their wardrobes without compensation, highlighting financial strain [12]. Group 4: Legal Basis for Claims - The lawsuits allege that Starbucks' dress code violates state laws requiring reimbursement for expenses that primarily benefit the employer [13]. - Colorado law specifically prohibits employers from imposing expenses on workers without their written consent [13][14]. Group 5: Union Involvement - The Starbucks Workers Union, which has organized 640 of Starbucks' 10,000 company-owned US stores, has filed numerous unfair labor practice charges against the company, including one related to the dress code [15].