利率决议出现唯一反对票，特朗普开始渗透美联储，他能成功么？

Core Viewpoint - The recent Federal Reserve interest rate decision, which saw a 25 basis point cut, is overshadowed by the implications of Stephen Milan's dissenting vote, indicating a potential shift in the Fed's independence and control by the Trump administration [1][3][12] Group 1: Stephen Milan's Background and Vote - Stephen Milan, born in 1984, holds a PhD in economics from Harvard and has over 10 years of experience in the financial sector, previously serving as a senior economic policy advisor at the Treasury during Trump's first term [1] - Milan's dissenting vote against the 25 basis point cut, advocating for a larger 50 basis point reduction, signals a significant shift in the Fed's dynamics, suggesting the Trump administration's influence over the central bank [3][10] Group 2: Federal Reserve's Structure and Independence - The Federal Reserve's monetary policy is managed by the Federal Open Market Committee, which includes 7 Board of Governors and 4 regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents, emphasizing the complexity of its governance [7] - The independence of the Federal Reserve from the U.S. government is a critical aspect of its structure, designed to prevent political interference in monetary policy decisions [8][10] Group 3: Implications of Presidential Control - Trump's ongoing efforts to exert control over the Federal Reserve are driven by his economic strategy, which relies on low interest rates to stimulate manufacturing and reduce government debt interest payments [10][12] - If the Federal Reserve loses its independence, it could lead to a collapse of the financial system that has been relied upon globally, as the Fed functions as a de facto world central bank [12][13]