Workflow
在解构中重建,在错误中涅槃
Hua Xia Shi Bao·2025-09-19 07:56

Core Insights - The article emphasizes that mistakes are an integral part of scientific progress, challenging the notion that errors should be avoided at all costs [2][3] - It highlights that scientific advancement occurs not through the accumulation of correct observations but through the refutation of existing theories and the proposal of new ones [3][4] Group 1: Importance of Mistakes in Science - The book "Why Greatness Needs Mistakes" illustrates that errors are common in scientific endeavors and are essential for innovation [2][4] - Examples from genetics and physics demonstrate how mistakes have led to significant advancements, such as Einstein's cosmological constant, which later contributed to the understanding of dark energy [3][4] - The article discusses the case of Hoyle's steady state universe model, which, despite being challenged, led to important insights regarding the creation of heavy elements in stars [3][4] Group 2: Distinction Between Science and Management - The article notes that many real-world problems are engineering issues rather than scientific ones, requiring a different approach to decision-making [4][5] - It points out that the cultural belief in China that scholars should take on management roles can lead to mismatches in leadership, as scientific thinking differs from management thinking [4][5] - The experience of a respected researcher who struggled in a management role illustrates the challenges faced when scientists transition to administrative positions [5] Group 3: The Nature of Scientific Inquiry - The article asserts that science is a methodology rather than an absolute truth, emphasizing the need for openness and adaptability in scientific inquiry [5][6] - It argues that the belief in the sanctity of science is a misunderstanding of its spirit, which should embrace questioning and the acceptance of new evidence [5][6]