美国法治双标现场，财长贝森特违规没事，美联储理事却死咬不放！

Core Points - The article discusses the contrasting treatment of Treasury Secretary Becerra and Federal Reserve Governor Cook regarding mortgage fraud allegations, highlighting a double standard in political accountability [1][5][20] - It emphasizes the political implications of the "primary residence" designation in U.S. tax law and how it can be manipulated for financial benefits [3][6][14] - The article suggests that the independence of the Federal Reserve is being undermined by political interference, particularly from the Trump administration [17][20] Summary by Sections Political Accountability - Becerra's dual designation of two properties as "primary residences" was downplayed by experts, while Cook faced severe scrutiny for similar actions [1][3][5] - The article questions the motivations behind the Trump administration's focus on Cook, suggesting it is politically motivated rather than a genuine concern for legal integrity [5][8][20] Mortgage Fraud Allegations - The concept of "primary residence" is crucial for tax benefits, and Becerra's actions in 2007 are framed as a manipulation of this system [3][6] - Cook's designation of her Atlanta home as a "vacation home" while claiming tax benefits in Michigan led to accusations of fraud, despite local tax authorities finding no violations [5][11] Federal Reserve Independence - The article argues that the Federal Reserve's independence is increasingly compromised by political pressures, particularly from the Trump administration, which seeks to control the institution for political gain [17][20] - The rapid appointment and voting behavior of newly appointed officials like Milan raise concerns about the politicization of the Federal Reserve [10][17] Broader Implications - The manipulation of mortgage policies for political purposes is framed as a historical pattern that could lead to systemic financial issues, similar to the 2008 financial crisis [15][20] - The article concludes that the erosion of legal standards and accountability in political actions ultimately harms the general public [20]