乌克兰等钱救急，欧盟为俄资产分歧难平，德国“开条件”松口变数

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing debate within the EU regarding the use of frozen Russian assets has intensified, with Germany showing a willingness to discuss potential solutions while emphasizing the need for caution and adherence to legal frameworks [1][3][6]. Group 1: Germany's Position - German Finance Minister Christian Lindner has softened his stance, indicating a readiness for "constructive discussions" on the EU's use of Russian assets, but insists that any actions must be conditional and carefully considered [1][3]. - Germany's cautious approach reflects concerns about breaching international law and the potential impact on the EU's financial credibility, as it has previously expressed legal doubts about the complete confiscation of assets [6][8]. Group 2: EU Internal Divisions - There is a significant divide within the EU, with Eastern European countries like Poland and the Baltic states advocating for more aggressive measures, such as directly using frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine [3][6]. - In contrast, traditional powers like Germany, France, and Italy prefer to limit actions to the interest generated from these assets, highlighting the complexities of reaching a consensus among member states [6][8]. Group 3: External Influences - The potential for U.S. policy changes regarding financial support for Ukraine could significantly influence the EU's decision-making process on utilizing Russian assets, with increased pressure to act if U.S. support diminishes [8][10]. - Conversely, if the U.S. resumes strong support for Ukraine, the urgency for the EU to act may decrease, leading to delays in asset utilization discussions [8][10]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The situation underscores the delicate balance the EU must strike between supporting Ukraine and maintaining its own financial and legal integrity, as any misstep could have long-term repercussions for the EU's international standing [10].