德国终于“松口”！欧盟欲冻结俄资产，乌克兰还能等到救命钱吗？

Core Viewpoint - The European Union is currently debating how to handle frozen Russian assets, with Germany's Finance Minister Klambauer indicating a willingness to discuss new uses for these assets, potentially breaking the deadlock in the ongoing discussions [1][3]. Group 1: EU's Internal Disagreements - There are significant divisions within the EU regarding the use of frozen Russian assets, with Eastern European countries advocating for the use of these funds to support Ukraine, while Germany, France, and Italy express concerns about the potential long-term impacts on international financial credibility [3][5]. - Germany's recent stance suggests a shift towards finding a consensus among EU members, indicating a desire to address the issue collaboratively rather than unilaterally [3][10]. Group 2: Risks and Reactions - Russia has warned that if the EU decides to use the principal of the frozen assets, it may retaliate against European companies operating in Russia and could disrupt energy supplies, raising concerns among EU member states reliant on Russian energy [5][8]. - The uncertainty surrounding U.S. support for Ukraine adds another layer of complexity, as a reduction in American aid could force the EU to shoulder more responsibility for Ukraine's financial needs [7][10]. Group 3: Legal and Financial Considerations - The EU's plans for utilizing the frozen assets remain incomplete, with legal implications and the need to maintain international financial order being critical factors in the decision-making process [8][10]. - Germany's proposal could lead to more flexible solutions, such as phased withdrawals or the establishment of dedicated mechanisms, but these must balance Ukraine's needs with the EU's long-term financial stability [8][10].