鲍威尔坚守岗位，直面特朗普批评，彰显独立决心与责任担当

Group 1 - The core conflict between the White House and the Federal Reserve centers around interest rate adjustments, with the White House pushing for lower rates to stimulate the economy and reduce government financing costs, while the Fed prioritizes long-term price stability and inflation control [1][4][8] - The Federal Reserve recently lowered the federal funds rate target range to 4% to 4.25%, marking the first rate cut since December of the previous year, which is seen as a response to ongoing pressure from the White House [4] - Fed Chairman Powell emphasizes his term will last until May 2026, signaling a commitment to institutional independence and stability amidst political pressures [6][12] Group 2 - The White House's rhetoric increasingly suggests the presence of dissent within the Federal Reserve, aiming to shift public scrutiny from economic data to the character and positions of decision-makers [8] - Market reactions to the rate cut included slight fluctuations in short-term and long-term bond yields, a temporary weakening of the dollar, and rebounds in certain stock market sectors, indicating a complex relationship between policy changes and real economic impacts [8][9] - The media plays a significant role in amplifying the conflict between the White House and the Federal Reserve, often simplifying complex economic issues into binary narratives, which can distort public understanding and sentiment [11]