有一种痛苦叫做“一梯两户”，不想住也卖不掉，彻底沦为不动产！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the decline of the "high-end" perception of the one-lift-two-house residential model, highlighting various issues that have led to its poor market performance and the challenges faced by homeowners in this segment [1][20]. Group 1: Elevator Issues - The primary selling point of one-lift-two-house residences is their claimed privacy and quietness, but in reality, residents face significant elevator wait times, averaging 12.7 minutes daily, which accumulates to over 77 hours annually [4][3]. - During peak hours, elevator congestion becomes a major inconvenience, exacerbated by occasional power outages and maintenance, particularly affecting families with elderly members or children [5][3]. Group 2: Shared Area Concerns - Developers often obscure the high shared area ratio in one-lift-two-house models, leading to a situation where buyers pay for a significant amount of unusable space, with actual usable area potentially being only 65 square meters out of a 100 square meter purchase [8][6]. - Compared to two-lift-four-house models, which have a more reasonable shared area ratio, one-lift-two-house residences present a poor value proposition, leading to buyer dissatisfaction [8][6]. Group 3: Market Challenges - One-lift-two-house properties are difficult to sell, with an average listing time of 187 days, nearly double that of standard homes at 93 days, due to perceived low value for money among potential buyers [12][10]. - High prices and large areas deter many potential buyers, resulting in these properties becoming "dead assets" in the market [14][10]. Group 4: Hidden Costs - Homeowners often overlook ongoing costs associated with one-lift-two-house residences, such as property management fees and maintenance costs, which can significantly increase overall expenses over time [16][14]. - For example, a property with a high shared area can lead to an additional annual property fee of around 2000 yuan, further straining homeowners' finances [16][14]. Group 5: Community Dynamics - The design of one-lift-two-house residences, intended to enhance privacy, ironically leads to a lack of community interaction, with residents reporting a significantly lower neighborhood engagement index compared to standard housing [18][5]. - Studies indicate that residents in these homes face a 27.5% higher risk of depression, particularly affecting vulnerable groups like the elderly and homemakers [18][5]. Group 6: Policy Trends - Regulatory standards are tightening, limiting the viability of one-lift-two-house models, with new guidelines requiring at least two elevators for buildings over 12 stories, signaling a potential phase-out of this housing type [19][18]. - Developers are shifting focus towards more practical and community-oriented housing designs, moving away from the previously favored "high-end" models [19][18].