签合伙人协议后到期未返钱，法院认定为借贷合同判还本金

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the agreements between the parties constituted a private lending relationship, requiring the defendant to repay the plaintiff the principal amount of 360,000 yuan along with interest [1][2]. Group 1: Agreements and Financial Transactions - The first partnership agreement was signed in January 2022, where the plaintiff paid a guarantee deposit of 300,000 yuan with a profit-sharing reward of 36,000 yuan, and the agreement stipulated a return of the deposit after six months [1]. - The second partnership agreement was signed in July 2022, with the plaintiff paying an additional guarantee deposit of 200,000 yuan and a profit-sharing reward of 24,000 yuan, also with a six-month return period [1]. - After the agreements expired, the defendant only transferred 140,000 yuan back to the plaintiff and failed to return the remaining amounts despite multiple requests [1][2]. Group 2: Court's Rationale and Judgment - The court determined that the agreements lacked characteristics of joint operation, shared profits, or risk-sharing, indicating that the funds were effectively loans rather than investments [2]. - The court supported the plaintiff's claim for the return of the principal amount due to the overdue repayment terms outlined in the agreements [2]. - The interest claimed by the plaintiff was within the contractual and legal limits, leading the court to uphold the request for interest alongside the principal repayment [2].