六年前美国挥关税大棒对华强硬：如今代表团访华，史密斯赞中国意图何在？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant shift in the U.S. Congress's attitude towards China, highlighting a recent visit by a bipartisan delegation that praised China as one of the "most powerful and influential countries in the world" [3][6][8]. Group 1: U.S.-China Relations - The visit marks the first official engagement by the U.S. House of Representatives with China since 2019, indicating a thaw in relations [3][6]. - Congressman Adam Smith's use of the term "most" to describe China reflects a stark contrast to previous characterizations of China as a "strategic threat" or "enemy" [6][10]. - The shift in tone suggests a recognition that the U.S. cannot isolate or completely contain China, as it has become a crucial player in global issues [10][12]. Group 2: Economic and Security Concerns - The article notes that the U.S. has faced economic backlash from its previous hardline stance, particularly in agriculture, where exports to China have significantly declined [15][17]. - The U.S. military is increasingly concerned about rising tensions in sensitive regions, with incidents of close encounters between U.S. and Chinese forces increasing by nearly 20% year-on-year [17][19]. - The lack of effective military communication channels has raised fears of unintended conflicts, prompting a reevaluation of U.S. strategies towards China [19][34]. Group 3: Political Dynamics in the U.S. - The article highlights the complexities of U.S. governance, where the legislative and executive branches may have conflicting views on foreign policy, complicating efforts to improve U.S.-China relations [21][23]. - Despite the positive rhetoric from the congressional delegation, their ability to influence significant policy changes is limited due to the separation of powers in the U.S. government [21][26]. - The need for consistent and actionable policies is emphasized, as past statements have often failed to translate into concrete actions [28][30]. Group 4: Future of U.S.-China Relations - The article suggests that while there is a newfound willingness to engage, the underlying competition between the two nations remains, with ongoing tensions in technology, supply chains, and global governance [30][32]. - The future relationship is likely to be characterized by a "dangerous balance," where both nations must manage competition while avoiding direct conflict [32][36]. - The interdependence of the two economies means that cooperation is essential, particularly in areas like climate change and regional security, despite the competitive nature of their relationship [36][38].