Workflow
华盛锂电股价跌5%,华安基金旗下1只基金位居十大流通股东,持有57.31万股浮亏损失120.36万元

Group 1 - Core viewpoint: Huasheng Lithium Battery's stock price dropped by 5% to 39.90 CNY per share, with a trading volume of 175 million CNY and a market capitalization of 6.364 billion CNY as of September 23 [1] - Company overview: Jiangsu Huasheng Lithium Battery Materials Co., Ltd. focuses on the research, production, and sales of lithium battery electrolyte additives, with main business revenue composition being 67.54% from VC, 27.01% from FEC, and 5.44% from others [1] Group 2 - Major shareholders: Huasheng Lithium Battery's top circulating shareholder includes Huazhang Fund, which holds 573,100 shares of Huasheng Lithium Battery, accounting for 0.92% of circulating shares, with an estimated floating loss of approximately 1.2036 million CNY [2] - Fund performance: Huazhang Low Carbon Life Mixed A (006122) has a year-to-date return of 42.59% and a one-year return of 95.85%, ranking 1568 out of 8172 and 743 out of 7995 respectively [2] Group 3 - Fund manager details: The fund manager of Huazhang Low Carbon Life Mixed A is Xiong Zheying, who has been in the position for 4 years and 204 days, with a total fund asset size of 1.113 billion CNY [3] - Fund performance metrics: During Xiong Zheying's tenure, the best fund return was 36.41%, while the worst was -3.67% [3] Group 4 - Top holdings: Huazhang New Energy Theme Mixed A (014541) holds 87,800 shares of Huasheng Lithium Battery, making it the seventh-largest holding in the fund, with an estimated floating loss of about 184,400 CNY [4] - Fund performance: Huazhang New Energy Theme Mixed A has a year-to-date return of 46.29% and a one-year return of 76.15%, ranking 1290 out of 8172 and 1447 out of 7995 respectively [4] Group 5 - Fund manager details: The fund manager of Huazhang New Energy Theme Mixed A is also Xiong Zheying, with a total fund asset size of 1.113 billion CNY [5] - Fund performance metrics: Similar to the previous fund, the best return during Xiong Zheying's tenure was 36.41%, and the worst was -3.67% [5]