作者、专家和顾问，这三种角色到底有什么区别？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the distinctions between three roles: author, expert, and consultant, emphasizing their different contributions to problem-solving and knowledge dissemination in the industry [66]. Group 1: Roles and Responsibilities - Authors primarily explain phenomena and present them in an understandable manner, akin to commentators in sports [4][5]. - Experts, on the other hand, abstract frameworks and principles that help in understanding why certain methods are effective and under what circumstances they apply [12][13]. - Consultants are expected to diagnose issues in real-time and provide tailored solutions based on the specific context of a business [42][43]. Group 2: Methodology and Application - The article highlights that while authors can provide insights and suggestions, true value lies in developing a methodology that can be reused across different scenarios [36][40]. - It contrasts Western experts, who rely on theoretical frameworks, with many domestic experts who often act as "experience transporters," applying specific past experiences without adapting them to new contexts [24][22]. - The need for a structured approach in consulting is emphasized, where effective consultants should diagnose before prescribing solutions, rather than offering one-size-fits-all remedies [45][56]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The article notes that the domestic consulting environment has been influenced by a demand for quick solutions, leading to a prevalence of "quick-fix" methodologies rather than in-depth analysis [52][61]. - It discusses how the pressure for immediate results can hinder the adoption of comprehensive consulting practices, as businesses often prioritize short-term gains over long-term strategies [60][62]. - The distinction between "medical" and "pharmaceutical" consulting approaches is made, with the former focusing on tailored solutions and the latter on standardized methods that may not fit all situations [49][45].