Zhong Guo Jing Ying Bao·2025-09-23 06:50Group 1 - The takeaway from the article is that the intense competition in the food delivery market is cooling down, with a noticeable reduction in subsidies and promotional activities from major platforms [1][5][6] - Merchants have reported a significant decline in sales, with some experiencing a drop of over one-third in daily revenue compared to the peak months of July and August [1][3] - Delivery riders have also felt the impact, with a decrease in order volume leading to lower earnings, with some reporting daily incomes dropping from over 300 to around 200 [4][5] Group 2 - The article highlights a shift in focus from food delivery to in-store services, with platforms like Alibaba and JD.com launching new initiatives to promote in-store purchases and group buying [2][12] - The introduction of local lifestyle rankings, such as the "Gaode Street Ranking," indicates a strategic move by platforms to enhance their presence in the local service market, competing directly with existing players like Meituan [8][9] - The competition in the in-store segment is still in its early stages, with platforms relying on user reviews and experiences to drive traffic, which is more complex than the food delivery model [13][14] Group 3 - The article discusses the financial implications of the food delivery battle, noting that while the competition has led to increased market share for platforms, it has also negatively impacted profitability [5][6] - The profitability of in-store services is significantly higher than that of food delivery, with operating profit margins for in-store services reaching 45.6% compared to just 6.5% for food delivery [12] - The platforms are expected to avoid large-scale subsidy wars in the in-store segment, focusing instead on sustainable growth and enhancing user experience [14][15]